consulting_freak: (Default)
Sherlock Holmes ([personal profile] consulting_freak) wrote in [personal profile] glassesbrat 2014-12-17 11:50 pm (UTC)

Thank you for the apology.

I'd like to clarify that the incident with the mentioned other player isn't the stem of the issue. Conan's reliance on Sherlock and a handful of other characters has been an ongoing thing. The straw that broke the camel's back for me was when you mentioned both in IM and on plurk that the actions taken by me and two other players rendered Conan 'unplayable' for you. It was inappropriate and a better course of action would have been to drop the character or implement your canon reset without making a production of putting a name tag to the reason.

If you truly understand what went wrong and you'll make an effort not to repeat it, then that's good news all around. I would like to make one request regarding any potential plotting/cr for the future. I only need to be pinged once for relevant threads. If I choose not to tag into something for an IC or OOC reason, I reserve the right to make that decision without opening myself up to negotiation.

I'm not going to ask you to avoid talking to me on plurks and I won't refuse to thread with you in general. I don't hate you or harbour you any ill will. Everything's just worked up to a boiling point and I think it might be healthiest for everyone if we take a step back and let things heal naturally.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting